Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 62:
**:A regular point of confusion that I have around deletion discussions of academic journals is that this debate is really about whether to host this content in a ''stand-alone'' article. In this case, the current paragraph of text in the article (ignoring the list of prior editors and the list of databases that index it) is perfectly [[WP:V|verifiable]] and seems [[WP:DUE]] to include essentially unaltered in [[List of IEEE publications]] (a notable list). So it doesn't seem like we're debating deletion of the content (which will still be on Wikipedia), but rather whether that content should be hosted in a stand-alone article versus in a list. [[User:Suriname0|Suriname0]] ([[User talk:Suriname0|talk]]) 16:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
*'''Delete or redirect''' does not pass the GNG. [[Wikipedia talk:Notability (academic journals)#RfC on notability criteria|There is no consensus]] to use NJOURNALS as a SNG, no matter how much its proponents would like to [[WP:LOCALCONSENSUS|LOCALCONSENSUS]] their way into [[Mean Girls|making fetch a thing]]. --[[User:In actu|<span style="color: #0b0080">In actu (Guerillero)</span>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Guerillero|<span style="color: green;">Parlez Moi</span>]]</sup> 13:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
*:[[WP:VAGUEWAVE]]. This is a forum to discuss this specific journal and its sourcing, not to rehash stale battles about the sacred writ of our holy texts. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 20:49, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||