Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Response to Hobit |
|||
Line 98:
:::{{u|Hobit}}: I really can't see how merge would work in this instance? [[List of IEEE publications]] has hundreds of publications, with no text about any of them. [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] <small>([[User talk:Espresso Addict|talk]])</small> 22:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
::::Yeah, as I thought about it more I reached the conclusion it would be a major change and so maybe a keep is better. But I think a bare list, as we have now, is a bit useless. I'd think we could do something like a "list of episodes" thing and split magazines from journals. Still a long list, but not a crazy one. Include years active, how often it's published and some details about each one (say under 500 words). Given that is such a huge change, I do think that a keep is probably the right answer for now. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 23:15, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
:::::The idea was presumably just to list blue links, but few editors are masochistic enough to bother systematically creating articles on academic journals at present. [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] <small>([[User talk:Espresso Addict|talk]])</small> 23:57, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
::::Like [[User:Hobit]], I believe this is quite possible. If the text of [[List of IEEE publications]] gets too long, it can be broken down by publication type (e.g. journals, magazines) and subsequently field (EE, SE, etc.). [[User:Suriname0|Suriname0]] ([[User talk:Suriname0|talk]]) 23:21, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
| |||