Content deleted Content added
m →Practical aspects: Modify an internal link |
WP:DUPLINK. use acro def. |
||
Line 48:
==Relationship to SDN==
Network Functions Virtualisation is highly complementary to
Thus, NFV is not dependent on SDN or SDN concepts, but NFV and SDN can cooperate to enhance the management of a NFV infrastructure and to create a more dynamic network environment. It is entirely possible to implement a virtualized network function (VNF) as a standalone entity using existing networking and orchestration paradigms. However, there are inherent benefits in leveraging SDN concepts to implement and manage an NFV infrastructure, particularly when looking at the management and orchestration of Network Services (NS), composed of different type of Network Functions (NF), such as Physical Network Functions (PNF) and VNFs, and placed between different geo-located NFV infrastructures, and that's why multivendor platforms are being defined that incorporate SDN and NFV in concerted ecosystems.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cisco.com/go/esp|title=Platform to Multivendor Virtual and Physical Infrastructure}}</ref>
Line 154:
* [[OASIS TOSCA]]
* [[Open Platform for NFV]]
==References==
|