Content deleted Content added
→3O request: Reply |
→3O request: providing 3O |
||
Line 73:
::Hi {{ping|Voorts}} Sorry, I forgot to link: our earlier discussion is at [[User talk:Caleb Stanford]]. Thank you for posting here. [[User:Caleb Stanford|Caleb Stanford]] ([[User talk:Caleb Stanford|talk]]) 17:38, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
:::Ok. I can take a look. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 17:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
{| style="border-top: solid thin lightgrey; background: transparent; padding: 4px;"
| [[Image:Searchtool-80%.png|15px|link=]] '''Response to [[WP:Third opinion|third opinion request]] (Content and edit dispute about the state and neutrality of the article):'''
|-
| style="padding-left: 1.6em;" | I am responding to a third opinion request for this page. I have made no previous edits on V (programming language) and have no known association with the editors involved in this discussion. The third opinion process is informal and I have no special powers or authority apart from being a fresh pair of eyes.
|-
| style="padding-left: 1.6em;" |
In my opinion, {{u|Caleb Stanford}}'s version of the article has removed a significant amount of adverty language and removed wikivoice where appropriate. For example, from the lead of {{u|Wukuendo}}'s version, the following is quite promotional: "The foremost goal of V is to be easy to use,[9][10][11] and at the same time, to enforce a safe coding style through elimination of ambiguity." I also believe that it was appropriate to remove much of the information from the features section, per [[WP:NOTDB]]. <!-- Template:Third opinion response --> [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 17:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
|}
| |||