Talk:V (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 93:
::I'm for rewrites in good faith, where an even standard is fairly applied across the board for all programming languages. Case in point, look at the articles of say Zig, Crystal, or Red (to name a few). By comparison, I'm quite curious of your opinion.
::The V article went through a very long and arguably contentious process of accusation of promotional or advertisement-like language. The issue with Caleb's rewriting, outside the affiliation with Rust, is it appears the language used is purposefully disparaging and insulting. Without having the issue resolved or any agreement, there is already an attempt to bypass all the other editors and reviewers that came before. [[User:Wukuendo|Wukuendo]] ([[User talk:Wukuendo|talk]]) 18:06, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
:::As I already mentioned, I am not affiliated with Rust. Which part of the language is "disparaging and insulting"? [[User:Caleb Stanford|Caleb Stanford]] ([[User talk:Caleb Stanford|talk]]) 18:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)