Content deleted Content added
m →COI |
|||
Line 115:
::@[[User:Wukuendo|Wukuendo]], nobody is attempting to undermine the article in an attempt to get it deleted or to discredit you. As I said before, please [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]]. [[User:Voorts|voorts]] ([[User talk:Voorts|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Voorts|contributions]]) 21:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
:::Caleb Stanford, you are the one who place the COI template on the page. I am not sure if that is needed as everyone appears to have denied a COI, and I don't see any evidence of one. Just checking. [[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy🏄]] ([[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 22:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
:::: Sirfurboy, after more carefully reviewing evidence (which I will present today), it may go beyond that. The case can be presented that the point was to slyly vandalize the article (editing the project in an intentionally disruptive or malicious manner). And to do so in a way that the article becomes unuseful to readers interested about V and that previous editors can not change it back or contest the changes, thus the tags and accusations. An editor would be hard pressed to address the massive rewriting, even without first defending themselves from the accusations made by the tags. It's why I believe higher level administrative action might be necessary. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wukuendo|Wukuendo]] ([[User talk:Wukuendo#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wukuendo|contribs]]) 23:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
| |||