Content deleted Content added
Roger McCoy (talk | contribs) Created article from Stargate (film) and Stargate SG-1 |
Roger McCoy (talk | contribs) Added section headers (including "references" section) and corrected italics |
||
Line 1:
The original ''[[Stargate (film)|Stargate]]'' film did not develop as much of depth as would be needed in a television series. MGM, which owned the rights, took Roland Emmerich and Dean Devlin's product and handed the reins to a new team of creators (Brad Wright and Jonathan Glassner) for ''[[Stargate SG-1]]''. This new team introduced many new concepts to make the ''Stargate'' universe into a workable weekly science fiction show. Also, certain details were changed.
==Changes to the stargate==
*The chevron on the film's stargate is different aesthetically than the rest of its chevrons. In ''SG-1'', all the chevrons on a stargate are visually identical.
*The symbols on the film's gate are engraved into the surface of the stargate. In ''SG-1'''s universe, the symbols protrude from the gates' surface.
*In the film, each stargate has a unique set of 39 symbols, but in the series, each gate has the same 38 symbols (Earth's symbols based on Earth's constellations), minus a single point of origin symbol that is unique to that individual gate. ==Names==
* Colonel Jack O'Neill's name was spelled ''O'Neil''.
* Colonel Jack O'Neill's wife/ex-wife was named ''Sarah'' rather than ''Sara''. ==Other changes==
*In the ''Stargate'' film, Ra is the last of his race, which is a humanoid species with large black eyes and a lack of facial features. In ''SG-1'', Ra is one of many "[[Goa'uld]] [[System Lord]]s".
*The [[ring transporter]]s in the film consist of nine rings that stack on top of one another; in ''SG-1'', only five are ever used, and are more widely spaced. Additionally, the special effects used were different. The film version shows the transported person or object dematerialize and the particles move towards the destination (for instance, up when going to Ra's ship or down when going to the pyramid). In the television series, a less complex effect was used; a yellow-orange light would vertically sweep through the interiors of the rings, usually sweeping upward, even when the destination is below.
*In the film, the [[planet]] [[Abydos (Stargate)|Abydos]] resides millions of [[lightyear]]s away in an entirely different [[galaxy]]. In ''SG-1'', Abydos is the closest planet to [[Earth]] that has a stargate, residing in the same galaxy as Earth. Also in ''SG-1'', stargate travel is limited to the stargate network in the [[Milky Way galaxy]] (unless a tremendous amount of power is used to lengthen the subspace wormhole of a stargate to another galaxy's stargate).
*The
* [[Ra (Stargate)|Ra]]'s species was not named, and Ra was presented as using a sort of incorporeal "possession" of a human host instead of direct biological parasitism. In the director's cut, however, there is a scene where fossils are found and they are the biological parasite.
*The symbols on the Abydos
* The first time Daniel Jackson sees the
* In the episode "[[The Torment of Tantalus (Stargate SG-1)|The Torment of Tantalus]]", it was clearly stated [[Catherine Langford]] was twenty-one in 1945, which would make her about four years old in 1928. However, she is much older in the opening sequence of the film, which is set in that year.
* In the episode "[[Children of the Gods (Stargate SG-1)|Children of the Gods]]", O'Neill told General Hammond that their "first clue" Ra was an alien was the fact that his eyes glowed. In the film, O'Neill did not encounter Ra until after Daniel Jackson had discovered he was an alien.
Line 31 ⟶ 34:
Because of these differences, some fans of the film consider the television series as its own separate entity, rather than a proper sequel to the film.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} Using some of Emmerich's notes, Bill McCay wrote a [[Stargate film novels|series of five novels]] continuing the story the original creators had envisioned. However, recently Dean Devlin stated that there was an interest in creating the original sequels and that the McCay books were not correct.<ref>[http://gateworld.net/news/2006/07/devlin_optimistic_about_stargate.shtml Devlin optimistic about 'Stargate' sequels], by Darren Sumner, GateWorld, ''July 21, 2006''</ref>
==References==
<div class="references-small">
<references/>
</div>
{{StargateTopics}}
|