Model transformation language: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Overview: | Alter: template type. Add: s2cid, issue, volume, journal, date, title, doi, authors 1-4. Changed bare reference to CS1/2. | Use this tool. Report bugs. | #UCB_Gadget
OAbot (talk | contribs)
m Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot.
Line 7:
Currently, most model transformation languages are being developed in academia. The [[Object Management Group|OMG]] has standardised a family of model transformation languages called [[QVT]], but the field is still immature.<ref name="FranceRumpe"/>
 
There are ongoing debates regarding the benefits of specialised model transformation languages, compared to the use of general-purpose programming languages (GPLs) such as [[Java]].<ref>https://www.jot.fm/issues/issue_2019_03/article7.pdf</ref> While GPLs have advantages in terms of more widely-available practitioner knowledge and tool support, the specialised transformation languages do provide more declarative facilities and more powerful specialised features to support model transformations.<ref>{{cite journal | url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10664-022-10194-7 | doi=10.1007/s10664-022-10194-7 | title=Advantages and disadvantages of (Dedicated) model transformation languages | date=2022 | last1=Höppner | first1=Stefan | last2=Haas | first2=Yves | last3=Tichy | first3=Matthias | last4=Juhnke | first4=Katharina | journal=Empirical Software Engineering | volume=27 | issue=6 | s2cid=251644010 | doi-access=free }}</ref>
 
== Available transformation languages ==