|
:Agreed, this needlessly confuses matters at the head of the article, I have changed it accordingly. [[User:VerPerson|VerPerson]] ([[User talk:VerPerson|talk]]) 17:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
{{Clear}}
==Real Academia==
All of these should be but into italics, due to the fact that they are all in another language. I won't do it unless it is confirmed with a person better in grammer then I am.
[[Special:Contributions/66.41.83.205|66.41.83.205]] ([[User talk:66.41.83.205|talk]]) 23:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
:But all example sentences are put into italic. [[Special:Contributions/27.3.74.193|27.3.74.193]] ([[User talk:27.3.74.193|talk]]) 14:43, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
{{Clear}}
==ATENTION==
Sorry but inverted exclamation mark and interrogation mark are not used in written PORTUGUESE. do you know why? ¡¡¡¡¡Because I'm PORTUGUESE!!!!!
I'm editing here to say just that you have another mistake, not just in portuguese, both exclamation and interrogation marks are also not used in galician, as someone affirms at the beginning of this article. Please fix that. BTW I'm attaching here a link to the Normativa oficial do galego (galician official normative). You can also consult it to RAG (Real Academia Galega), the official institution which decides the normative. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/83.165.19.115|83.165.19.115]] ([[User talk:83.165.19.115#top|talk]]) 19:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
{{Clear}}
== ¿Why does the article not cover the inverted Interrobang? Maybe, we should add inverted Interrobang and shorten the name of the article to "Inverted Punctuation". ==
¿What is the opinion of others? <small><nowiki>[unsigned & undated comment]</nowiki></small>
*'''Disagree''': Inverted interrobang → ⸘ (it isn't used in Spanish). <small><nowiki>[unsigned & undated comment]</nowiki></small>
*'''Partially agree''': this article is '''not''' about Spanish, it is about upside-down question ''and'' exclamation marks; the interrobang is precisely a combination of upside-down question ''and'' exclamation marks, so it ''does'' merit inclusion. However, (i) only a brief mention is warranted, in a separate sub-section; and (ii) the article title should not be changed, because other inverted punctuation should ''not'' be added — otherwise we will have also inverted quotation marks added, and they should be handled separately. —DIV ([[Special:Contributions/49.179.148.244|49.179.148.244]] ([[User talk:49.179.148.244|talk]]) 07:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC))
{{od}}
"Why does the article not cover the inverted Interrobang?" My answer would be "likely because noone has added material for it". That is, [[WP:BOLD|boldly]] go ahead! The worst case is you're reverted, and the reverting editor would then have to argue why your material didn't hold up. At the very least, he or she would have to suggest another article better suited to your material. Cheers [[User:CapnZapp|CapnZapp]] ([[User talk:CapnZapp|talk]]) 09:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
{{Clear}}
== Dialects ==
Please explicitly clarify whether there are any significant differences in usage among dialects in Spain versus those in the Americas.
—DIV ([[Special:Contributions/49.179.148.244|49.179.148.244]] ([[User talk:49.179.148.244|talk]]) 07:21, 18 April 2020 (UTC))
:There are none. Added that. --[[User:ExperiencedArticleFixer|ExperiencedArticleFixer]] ([[User talk:ExperiencedArticleFixer|talk]]) 09:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
{{Clear}}
== Computer Usage ==
The majority of the Computer Usage section seems to violate [[Wikpedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal|WP:Manual]]. The majority of the section is a how-to about inserting the symbols on various keyboards. It was helpful to me after a quick Google search, but nevertheless, it doesn't belong here in my opinion. [[User:Mrytzkalmyr|Mrytzkalmyr]] ([[User talk:Mrytzkalmyr|talk]]) 00:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
:Okay, it seems I don't know how to link Wikipedia guidelines. My link was supposed to be to What Wikipedia is Not and the manual, guidebook, textbook, scientific journal section. [[User:Mrytzkalmyr|Mrytzkalmyr]] ([[User talk:Mrytzkalmyr|talk]]) 00:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
::The shortcut is given at the sidebox at each policy, in this case it's [[WP:NOTMANUAL]]. [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal]] works so it is not obvious why your version doesn't! So does [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal|WP:manual]]. I still can't see why yours doesn't, it must be something you said ;-)
::But to come back to your main point, I agree. We have an article [[Unicode input]] for that. But at other similar articles, enough people seem to believe it useful that there is no consensus in favour of deletion. --[[User:John Maynard Friedman|John Maynard Friedman]] ([[User talk:John Maynard Friedman|talk]]) 12:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
::Most of the articles on any non-ASCII letters or symbols have info on how to type them on various operating systems and keyboards. However I agree that the current wording is ridiculously long and convoluted. For instance it goes into details about how to make the AltGr key work on Windows and the fact that the key used is marked "Alt", all of that is ignored mostly, code just says "type AltGr+!". This should be shortened to a table, which also reveals the fact that the shortcuts are pretty much the same (somthing+! and something+?) on all systems.[[User:Spitzak|Spitzak]] ([[User talk:Spitzak|talk]]) 17:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
| 