Wikipedia:I don't agree with that: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:34, 11 November 2023

Revision as of 17:35, 11 November 2023

Line 1:

{{Humornotguideline|WP:IDAWT}}

{{nutshell|A handy link to use when improperly accused of [[WP:IDHT]] (I didn't hear that) during talk page disputes.}}

{{warning| CONTAINS JEREMY CLARKSON}}

[[File:電気メガホンEM-202.JPG|thumb|Arguing more loudly doesn't make you more right.]]

[[File:Ear muff white bg.jpg|thumb|Ignoring an opposing point of view doesn't make it go away.]]

[[File:Peppa pig bg.jpg hahaha, pig]]

Quite often, in a talk page dispute, it will come down to one person thinking that if they repeat their argument enough, they'll win. If that doesn't work, they'll invariably whip out the ole' [[WP:IDHT]] link, thinking that citing a wiki-policy will suddenly give them that decisive advantage. The best way to respond to that is to politely say; "''I did hear, [[WP:IDAWT|I just don't agree with that]].''"

Line 24 ⟶ 22:

*Bertram: "''The problem here is you have a bad case of [[WP:IDHT]]''"

*Ernesto: "''No, I heard you, [[WP:IDAWT|I just don't agree with that]].''"

*jeremy clarkson “shut up”

*ernesto “uno reverse card”

*jeremy Clarkson “no I won’t shut up, I just don’t agree with that”

See the article named [[jeremy Clarkson|our true leader]]

Now you can add your own link for good measure. (Just don't pay any attention to the fact that the discussions take place visually and there is no audio component.) This new process is estimated to cut down on content disputes by up to 50%.{{cn|date=February 2016}}