|
:More to the point, those refutations of creationist poppycock come from reliable sources, and your [[WP:OR|original research]] trying to find fault with them is 100% irrelevant. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 13:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
::Regarding transitional fossils, the concept of [[Precambrian Rabbit|Fossil rabbits in the Precambrian]] is relevant. [[User:Kauri0.o|Kauri0.o]] ([[User talk:Kauri0.o|talk]]) 00:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
== False balance issues ==
I might try to eventually improve this but in case someone can before I do, examples are "Supporters of evolution have argued in response that [...]", "Supporters of evolution have argued in response [...]", etc. Since apologetic and scientific views don't work with the same standards of evidence, the latter can be presented in Wikipedia's voice instead of as only arguments or opinions, to better comply with [[WP:YESPOV]] and [[WP:GEVAL]]. —[[User:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#44a;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Paleo</span>]][[User talk:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#272;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Neonate</span>]] – 13:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
:I agree with this. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 20:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
::I removed all instances where "supporters of evolution" were used like that. There may still be other wordings of false balance. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 09:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
:::There is no need to attempt to support something when it is already scientifically proven and universally accepted. Thank you for removing them. [[User:Wretchskull (alt)|Wretchskull (alt)]] ([[User talk:Wretchskull (alt)|talk]]) 11:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
::::I just audited the recent changes and thank you all for the improvements, —[[User:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#44a;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Paleo</span>]][[User talk:PaleoNeonate|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#272;text-shadow:2px 2px 3px DimGray;">Neonate</span>]] – 06:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
::[[User:Hob Gadling]] - I just reverted one of those. A quote cited to talkorigins.org arguing in their CA611 Response section has [[WP:VERIFY]] support for "Supporters of evolution have argued in response [...]". It is inappropriate to rephrase that into wikivoice as “actuality”. Cheers [[User:Markbassett|Mark bassett]] ([[User talk:Markbassett|talk]]) 22:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
::The second one I let be, though it is now grammatically confused, and you might revisit that. Changing “Evolutionary supporters point out” to “But” ... at “But evolution is neither dogmatic nor based on faith, and they accuse creationists of [...]” leaves it confused — who are the “they” making accusations, and what cite supports that? They nearest cite is for the next line about a court decision. Cheers [[User:Markbassett|Markbassett]] ([[User talk:Markbassett|talk]]) 23:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
::The third one I reverted to revised phrasings. The cite to talkorigins CI100 can be attributed as “Supporters of evolution generally respond by arguing that” ... but that cite does not [[WP:VERIFY]] give support for “Actually” in wikivoice and no attribution. Cheers [[User:Markbassett|Markbassett]] ([[User talk:Markbassett|talk]]) 23:34, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
:::You do not need to notify me, I have a watchlist. Your changes are not unreasonable. --[[User:Hob Gadling|Hob Gadling]] ([[User talk:Hob Gadling|talk]]) 05:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
== Objection to calling "Evolution " proven science. ==
| 