Erlang (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
This article describe better at the bottom what the 9s stands for and what nine 9s means in term of downtime in a year.
Tags: Reverted Visual edit
Line 46:
[[File:Mike williams.jpg|thumb|Mike Williams]]
 
In February 1998, Ericsson Radio Systems banned the in-house use of Erlang for new products, citing a preference for non-proprietary languages.<ref>{{cite thesis|url=https://cogsys.uni-bamberg.de/team/schmid/uoshp/lehreuos/fp01-www/fp-referate/erlang/bjarnelic.pdf#page=45|title=Concurrent Functional Programming for Telecommunications: A Case Study of Technology Introduction|first=Bjarne|last=Däcker|date=October 2000|publisher=Royal Institute of Technology|page=37}}</ref> The ban caused Armstrong and others to make plans to leave Ericsson.<ref name="questions"/> In March 1998 Ericsson announced the AXD301 switch,<ref name="hopl"/> containing over a million lines of Erlang and reported to achieve a [[high availability]] of [[ninesHigh (engineering)availability|nine "9"s]].<ref>
{{cite web |url=http://www.rabbitmq.com/resources/armstrong.pdf |title=Concurrency Oriented Programming in Erlang |date=9 November 2002}}
</ref> In December 1998, the implementation of Erlang was open-sourced and most of the Erlang team resigned to form a new company Bluetail AB.<ref name="hopl"/> Ericsson eventually relaxed the ban and re-hired Armstrong in 2004.<ref name="questions">{{cite web |url=http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2006-July/021368.html |title=question about Erlang's future |date=6 July 2010}}</ref>