Why Men Rule: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Alastair Haines (talk | contribs)
m Table of contents: killed even more trivia
Alastair Haines (talk | contribs)
Added reviews
Line 23:
* Appendix: Alleged Exceptions to the Universality of Patriarchy and Male Dominance
* Index
==Reviews==
* [http://www.narth.com/docs/politics-gender.html 'The Politics of Gender'.]
<p>From back cover of Open Court, soft cover, first edition, 1993.</p>
* "Splendid—one of those rare books that changes one's mind about a profound issue. ... A book that has endured and is even more imposing than when it was first written. ... Goldberg has one of the keenest minds in the social sciences today." Joseph Adelson
* "Iron clad." [[William Kephart]]
* "... persuasive and accurate. It is true, as Professor Goldberg points out, that all the claims so glibly made for societies ruled by women are nonsense. We have no reason to believe that they ever existed. ... men everywhere have been in charge of running the show. ... men have always been the leaders in public affairs and the final authorities at home." [[Margaret Mead]]
* "Coolly, tightly, cogently, even brilliantly reasoned." [[Morton Kaplan]]
* "Absolutely plausible and a sound corrective to the psuedoscientific fad that tries to disregard genetic and hereditary influences." Journal of Sex Research
* "Intellectually challenging." Rosemary Campbell, [[Washington Post]]
* "The most significant work on sex differences in decades." [[Murray Rothbard]]
* "A classic." Daniel Seligman
* "A classic." [[Ernest van den Haag]]
* "A classic." [[George Gilder]]
 
{{nonfiction-book-stub}}