Content deleted Content added
m Repositioned a paragraph that was in the wrong section Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
Rv addition which gives weight to views sharply at odds with the scientific consensus on climate change |
||
Line 53:
It has been argued that using sensational and alarming techniques, often evoke "denial, paralysis, or apathy" rather than motivating individuals to action and do not motivate people to become engaged with the issue of climate change.<ref name="Dilling & Moser">{{Cite book|last1=Lisa Dilling|author-link1=Lisa Dilling|last2=Susanne C. Moser|title=Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change|year=2007|publisher=Cambridge University Press|___location=Cambridge, UK|isbn=978-0-521-86923-2|pages=1–27|chapter=Introduction}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1177/1075547008329201 | title = "Fear Won't Do It": Promoting Positive Engagement with Climate Change Through Visual and Iconic Representations | year = 2009 | last1 = O'Neill | first1 = S. | last2 = Nicholson-Cole | first2 = S. | journal = Science Communication | volume = 30 | issue = 3 | pages = 355–379| s2cid = 220752087 }}</ref> In the context of [[climate refugee]]s—the potential for climate change to [[displaced person|displace people]]—it has been reported that "alarmist hyperbole" is frequently employed by [[private military contractor]]s and [[think tank]]s.<ref name="Hartmann2010">{{Cite journal|last=Hartmann |first=Betsy |year=2010 |title=Rethinking climate refugees and climate conflict: Rhetoric, reality and the politics of policy discourse |journal=Journal of International Development |volume=22 |issue=2 |pages=233–246 |issn=0954-1748 |doi=10.1002/jid.1676}}</ref>
==== To challenge the science related to global warming ====
|