Kakutani fixed-point theorem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1190723419 by AnomieBOT (talk)
Undid revision 1190721140 by Svennik (talk) It was actually the article on "Selection theorem" that was wrong. That bug has been corrected
Line 147:
 
== Relation to Brouwer's fixed-point theorem ==
 
{{Disputed section|Mistake in section "[[Kakutani_fixed-point_theorem#Relation_to_Brouwer's_fixed-point_theorem|Relation to Brouwer's fixed-point theorem]]"|date=December 2023}}
Brouwer's fixed-point theorem is a special case of Kakutani fixed-point theorem. Conversely, Kakutani fixed-point theorem is an immediate generalization via the [[Selection theorem|approximate selection theorem]]:<ref>{{Cite book |last=Shapiro |first=Joel H. |title=A Fixed-Point Farrago |date=2016 |publisher=Springer International Publishing |isbn=978-3-319-27978-7 |pages=68–70 |oclc=984777840}}</ref>
 
{{Math proof|proof=
By the approximate selection theorem{{dubious}}, there exists a sequence of continuous <math>f_n: S \to S</math> such that <math>\operatorname{graph}(f_n) \subset[\operatorname{graph}(\varphi)]_{1/n}</math>. By Brouwer fixed-point theorem, there exists a sequence <math>x_n</math> such that <math>f_n(x_n) = x_n</math>, so <math>(x_n, x_n) \in [\operatorname{graph}(\varphi)]_{1/n}</math>.
 
Since <math>S</math> is compact, we can take a convergent subsequence <math>x_n \to x</math>. Then <math>(x, x)\in \operatorname{graph}(\varphi)</math> since it is a closed set.