Wikipedia talk:Attribution/Poll: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Proposal: r |
→Proposal: still too long + bolding |
||
Line 1,971:
:::::::300 words should be adequate, and some people will go over it anyway. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 18:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
::::::::letting people say whats on their hearts and minds is the only thing we probably all won't fight over, since no one period had argued over the statement section that was already there. If they go over, they go over the 300, or 500, or whatever. It can't be enforced as a hard limit anyway, in reality. Just a nudge. :) - [[User_talk:DennyColt|Denny]] 18:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
:::::::::300 is still way too much. It will be blessed chaos if we invite people to ramble. I think we should suggest bolding "vote-like" words to make it easier to assess afterwards. "I '''support the merger in its entirety''' because I believe..." [[User:Marskell|Marskell]] 18:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
| |||