Content deleted Content added
→Statement of the classification theorem: "derived subgroup" is probably less confusing to most readers, as "derivative" may give the wrong impression. I may also just be wrong here, so feel free to change this back if you disagree. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
m typo(s) fixed: on June 2023 → in June 2023 |
||
Line 367:
==Notes==
<references group="note" />
==Citations==
<references />
Line 402 ⟶ 403:
* [https://mathoverflow.net/q/180355 In what sense is the classification of all finite groups “impossible”?]
* {{Cite journal|last=Ornes|first=Stephen|title=Researchers Race to Rescue the Enormous Theorem before Its Giant Proof Vanishes|url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/researchers-race-to-rescue-the-enormous-theorem-before-its-giant-proof-vanishes/|journal=[[Scientific American]]|date=2015|language=en|doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0715-68|title-link=doi|volume=313|issue=1|pages=68–75|pmid=26204718}}
* {{Cite web |title=Where are the second- (and third-)generation proofs of the classification of finite simple groups up to? |url=https://mathoverflow.net/questions/114943/where-are-the-second-and-third-generation-proofs-of-the-classification-of-fin|website=[[MathOverflow]] |language=en}} (Last updated
{{DEFAULTSORT:Classification Of Finite Simple Groups}}
| |||