Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Module talk:WikiProject banner) (bot |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Module talk:WikiProject banner) (bot |
||
Line 517:
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Inactive WikiProject banner]] has been [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|nominated for deletion]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 October 31#Template:Inactive WikiProject banner|'''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''']].<!--Template:Tfdnotice-->
-- [[Special:Contributions/65.92.247.90|65.92.247.90]] ([[User talk:65.92.247.90|talk]]) 13:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
== Auto parameter ==
{{moved from|Template talk:WikiProject banner shell}}
Noting here: we can now remove support for the <code><nowiki>{{auto|}}</nowiki></code> parameter from all PIQA projects; the bot should also remove it en masse from talk pages. [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 11:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
:Are you proposing to move this note to the banner shell, or remove completely from all banners? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 12:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
::Remove completely, as moot - [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 13:10, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
:::I'm not sure I follow. Are you saying that articles will not be automatically assessed in the future? Because I doubt that is true — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 21:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
::::AFAIK it was only ever used by bots, copying class ratings from projects that had one, to projects that didn't, adding <code>|auto=</code> so the rating could be manually reviewed (which no one did) in case projects disagreed with each others' assessments. Was also used in bot runs tagging a WikiProject onto all talk pages in a category tree, also involving the same class copying/inheritance. With PIQA 'inheritance' is the goal and doesn't require manual review. Not aware of another it was used by bots, except copying assessments across projects. Am I missing anything? [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 21:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
:::::I agree that once PIQA is rolled out, automatically assessing by inheritance will not be necessary. I believe there are other bots that do/did automatic assessments based on other crtieria, e.g. stub-class based on the length of the article. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 09:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
| |||