Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coshc function: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
XOR'easter (talk | contribs) →Coshc function: Reply |
XOR'easter (talk | contribs) →Coshc function: Reply |
||
Line 19:
*'''Redirect all''' These border on the territory of [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day|things made up one day]]. The "literature" on the topic is paltry ''and admits as much'': {{tq|The hyperbolic function <math>\sinh(x)/x</math> receives scant attention in the literature. [...] If you type “sinhc function” into Wikipedia, you get the discouraging message “Did you mean: sinc function?”}} [https://doi.org/10.4169/college.math.j.43.4.285]. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 17:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
*:That's hilarious! I wonder if any of the sources referenced on the [[Circular definition]] page reference the Wikipedia article in turn. [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>☎</big>]] 18:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
*:Regarding the MathWorld business, I've been [[User:XOR'easter/So,_you've_decided_to_write_about_physics_and/or_mathematics_on_Wikipedia#Websites,_social_media,_and_discussion_groups|keeping a list]] of examples where that site has been a shoddy source, particularly for names. I don't think they have very high standards; sometimes it seems that if one person said it one time, MathWorld will accept it as a term. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 20:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
| |||