Content deleted Content added
→Optimality of the solution: reword |
→Generalizations: side => additional |
||
Line 60:
In their original work on the problem, Gale and Shapley considered a more general form of the stable matching problem, suitable for [[university and college admission]]. In this problem, each university or college may have its own ''quota'', a target number of students to admit, and the number of students applying for admission may differ from the sum of the quotas, necessarily causing either some students to remain unmatched or some quotas to remain unfilled. Additionally, preference lists may be incomplete: if a university omits a student from their list, it means they would prefer to leave their quota unfilled than to admit that student, and if a student omits a university from their list, it means they would prefer to remain unadmitted than to go to that university. Nevertheless, it is possible to define stable matchings for this more general problem, to prove that stable matchings always exist, and to apply the same algorithm to find one.{{r|gale-shapley}}
A form of the Gale–Shapley algorithm, performed through a real-world protocol rather than calculated on computers, has been used for coordinating higher education admissions in France since 2018, through the [[Parcoursup]] system. In this process, over the course of the summer before the start of school, applicants receive offers of admission, and must choose in each round of the process whether to accept any new offer (and if so turn down any previous offer that they accepted). The method is complicated by
==Recognition==
|