Content deleted Content added
m Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13:
Power transition theory, a precursor of the [[Long Cycle Theory| long-cycle theory]] of [[hegemony]], seeks to explain trends between warring states in the past 500 years. It detects a general trend: a nation achieves [[hegemony| hegemonic power]] and then is challenged by a [[great power]]. This leads to a war which, in the past, has resulted a transition between two powers. Eugene R. Wittkopf explores past wars and their relation to power transition theory in his 1997 book ''World Politics: Trend and Transformation''. He explains the interactions using [[George Modelski]]'s Seapower Concentration Index.<ref name="Wittkopf"/>
In 1518, [[Portugal]] assumed a hegemonic position in world politics.{{cn | reason = ''pace'' Hapsburg Spain and Ottoman Turkey.|date=August 2023}} However, as the [[Netherlands]] rose in power during the [[Dutch Golden Age]] of 1588 to 1672, a series of struggles led to the destruction of Portugal's power and a transition to Dutch hegemony. Dutch hegemony came into question from 1688 with the wars of [[Louis XIV of France]], which resulted in what political scientists refer to as the "Britain I Cycle"; the [[Napoleonic Wars]] interrupted this cycle and questioned the hegemony Britain possessed. However,
In general, hegemonic periods last approximately 60 to 90 years and conflicts which result in a period stabilization of power-distribution last approximately 20 years.<ref name="Wittkopf"/> This can be explained through [[war-weariness]] and the tendency (although this was broken in the first half of the 20th century) for nations not to engage themselves in another conflict after being involved in a power transition.<ref name="Wittkopf"/>
|