Data monitoring switch: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by 103.97.240.33 (talk): Citespam
No edit summary
Line 34:
== Advantages ==
 
* Data monitoring switches facilitate centralizing network traffic monitoring in the [[Network operations center|NOC]].
* By providing remote monitoring and control, they save the time and expense of traveling to remote locations to install monitoring tools.
* They make it easier to share tools among groups.
By providing remote monitoring and control, they save the time and expense of traveling to remote locations to install monitoring tools.
* With data rate conversion capabilities, they enable 1 Gigabit tool to support 10 Gigabit links, and 10 Gigabit tools to monitor traffic aggregated from multiple 1 Gigabit links.
* They prevent tool oversubscription by pre-filtering traffic.
They make it easier to share tools among groups.
* They can Taptap network links directly, instead of relying on switch [[SPAN port]]s for monitoring access.
* Because of their high port densities compared to discreet Taps, they save rack space and power and can have a lower price per port.
With data rate conversion capabilities, they enable 1 Gigabit tool to support 10 Gigabit links, and 10 Gigabit tools to monitor traffic aggregated from multiple 1 Gigabit links.
* They are fully passive and unable to disrupt network traffic in the most commonly found circumstances. (Integrated Taps, if present have fail-to-wire on power failure.) This is compared to SPAN ports, where network traffic can be disrupted if the switch is not properly configured while setting up the SPAN port.<ref>[http://www.ebizq.net/topics/business_service_management/features/11496.html?page=1 Integrating Monitoring Access Into The Network Architecture]</ref>
They prevent tool oversubscription by pre-filtering traffic.
They can Tap network links directly, instead of relying on switch [[SPAN port]]s for monitoring access.
Because of their high port densities compared to discreet Taps, they save rack space and power and can have a lower price per port.
They are fully passive and unable to disrupt network traffic in the most commonly found circumstances. (Integrated Taps, if present have fail-to-wire on power failure.) This is compared to SPAN ports, where network traffic can be disrupted if the switch is not properly configured while setting up the SPAN port.<ref>[http://www.ebizq.net/topics/business_service_management/features/11496.html?page=1 Integrating Monitoring Access Into The Network Architecture]</ref>
 
== Disadvantages ==