Revision as of 11:56, 29 January 2024 edit Stevebroshar (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,185 edits →Note #3 claims that Pascal was used to implement Windows ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:58, 29 January 2024 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,752 edits m Signing comment by Stevebroshar - "→Note #3 claims that Pascal was used to implement Windows: " Next edit →
Line 133: The Pascal calling convention was used because it saves on code size. That doesn't mean that the Pascal language was used. This fallacious claim should have a citation. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/50.159.105.93\|50.159.105.93]] ([[User talk:50.159.105.93\|talk]]) 18:44, 20 June 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> I'll bet Raymond Chen knows whether it is true. -steve <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Stevebroshar\|Stevebroshar]] ([[User talk:Stevebroshar#top\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Stevebroshar\|contribs]]) 11:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> ~~I'll bet Raymond Chen knows whether it is true. -steve~~ == Infobox ==

Talk:Windows API: Difference between revisions