Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
VMS Mosaic (talk | contribs) m Consistant spelling |
||
Line 13:
which gives the color rendering index with respect to each sample.
The factor 4.6 was so chosen that the Ra of a standard warm-white Thalium lamp would be about 50. It also appeared that Ri could be negative (∆Ei ≥ 22), and this was indeed
calculated for some lamp test
The general color rendering index <math>R_a</math> is then the average of these eight separate indices.
:<math>R_a=\frac{1}{8}\sum_{i=1}^8 R_i</math>
In 1965, in order to be able to objectively compare the
properties of light sources, the CIE introduced a standardised measuring
method. This method calculates the
the light source being tested relative to the
reference illuminant. The first 8 test
These 8 test
rendering index Ra. The last 6
supply extra information about the
sources.
Line 34:
importance of Ri decreases as its value relative to 100 increases. This is
even more true for the Ra, which is the average of 8 individual Ri values,
and which gives only a global impression of the
of a light source. Indeed, in practice it can occur that a light source with
Ra = 85 is not always better than a light source whose Ra = 80.
A second disadvantage of the Ra value is the fact that it gives no
information as to the direction of the
saturated or less saturated without a change in the numerical value of ∆Ei,
while in general a saturated
An attempt at rectifying this has been made by the introduction of the
formed by the eight test
more lively, and so on. The objection to this method is that the principle of
true-to-nature
surfaces do not always correspond to equal visual assessments. The CIE
is rather hesitant about this method. The same goes for the so-called
on the flattering rendition of well-known objects (butter, grass, skin
etc.).
Line 60:
== References ==
* CIE Publication 13.3. Method of measuring & specifying colour
==External link==
|