Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Terminology: Removed biased phrasing that suggested an objective correct definition in the very same sentence that acknowledged a legitimate debate over the usage and definition of reproducibility. Edited to be consistent with the framing presented in the header of the article. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 24:
Reproducibility in the original, wide sense is only acknowledged if a replication performed by an ''independent researcher team'' is successful.
Unfortunately, the terms reproducibility and replicability sometimes appear even in the scientific literature with reversed meaning,<ref>{{cite arXiv|title=Terminologies for Reproducible Research|last1=Barba|first1=Lorena A.|year=2018|class=cs.DL |eprint=1802.03311}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Replicability vs. reproducibility — or is it the other way round?|last1=Liberman|first1=Mark|url=https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=21956|access-date=2020-10-15}}</ref>,
==Measures of reproducibility and repeatability==
| |||