Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Derrickson's unrealized projects: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
TimothyBlue (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 20:
:<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:OwenX|Owen×]] [[User talk:OwenX|<big>☎</big>]] 16:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Scott Derrickson's unrealized projects]]</noinclude></p>
*'''Delete''' per nom. Listcruft, fails NLIST. Bios don't need stand alone lists of projects that were not completed, completely unneeded CFORK. Nothing here that would improve the main, redirect would be pointless, but no objection to a consensus redirect. <span style="font-family:Courier;"><b> // [[User:TimothyBlue|Timothy]] :: [[User talk:TimothyBlue|talk]] </b></span> 15:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. Half the stuff announced in Hollywood doesn't get made. Some of these are attachment packages just to get further development going, but it can still just go to [[development hell]]. If there were a number of projects that he put a lot of development effort into, and that development work also got reported on, then I could see that being a notable list, but as it stands, it seems more of a [[WP:COATRACK]] of announcements. For example [[Guillermo del Toro's unrealized projects]] has some extensive material on unrealized projects for some entries (good), but it is unfortunately also includes numerous list entries on one-off announcements (bad). -[[User:2pou|2pou]] ([[User talk:2pou|talk]]) 20:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
| |||