Revision as of 14:29, 20 December 2006 edit Radiant! (talk \| contribs) 36,918 edits +cat ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:22, 4 April 2007 edit undo John Broughton (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 35,819 edits m Copyedit Next edit →
Line 9: #If they do not resolve the situation they lead to ArbCom cases (see corresponding essay on ArbCom cases) Almost everything you need to know about making or responding to an RFC is an extension of one of those ~~two~~three facts. The absolute best way to fare well in an RFC is to not do things wrong. If you are trolling, actively POV pushing, or generally being an [[WP:DICK\|asshole]], there is no guide in the world that can help you. Don't do that.

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/How to present a case: Difference between revisions