Content deleted Content added
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Dubious}} |
m v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) |
||
Line 11:
== Background ==
In the early days of computing, with the advent of interactive computing, the prevailing model involved a central computer connected to multiple terminals.<ref>[http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/lehre/SS01/hc/minicomp/ FU Berlin, 3. Minicomputer architecture]</ref> This configuration, known as the centralized or mainframe model, featured a powerful central computer that performed all the processing tasks, while [[Computer_terminals|terminals]] served as input/output devices for users to interact with the system. These systems were initially character based.
=== Character-oriented terminals ===
Line 18 ⟶ 17:
== Emulators ==
When personal computers became ubiquitous in the 1980s, they offered the option of running software on the user's personal computer, providing an opportunity to replace the expensive and space consuming hardware terminals with something that had additional functions.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.emtec.com/zoc/terminal-emulator.html |title=Emulating a Terminal on Personal Computers}}</ref>
[[Workstation]]s, usually running versions of [[Unix]], also became common in the 1980s. Unix systems usually provided access to the [[command line]] with locally-attached or dial-up terminals. Unix workstations were designed to be used primarily through a [[graphical user interface]] (GUI); to provide access to the command line, the GUI included terminal emulator applications that behaved like locally-attached terminals.
During the 1990s, new operating systems like [[Windows]] and [[OS/2]] arrived, providing the technical background for more terminal emulators like [https://winworldpc.com/product/telix/100-for-windows Telix for Windows], [[ZOC|ZOC for OS/2]], or [[PuTTY]], which was initially released for Windows in 1998 and which (together with its derivates) is still one a very popular choice to this day.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.slant.co/topics/1552/~best-terminal-emulators-for-windows |title=SSH Clients for Windows}}</ref>
Through the [[History_of_Linux|success of Linux]], especially running on data centers and cloud servers,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.debianadmin.com/powering-linux-in-the-data-center.htm|title=Powering Linux in the Data-Center}}</ref> the necessity of accessing remote computers through character based terminals remains. This is evident in the fact, that today lists of terminal emulators that could serve as alternative to the aforementioned [[PuTTY]] offers over 100 alternatives.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://alternativeto.net/software/putty/ |title=Alternatives to Putty}}</ref>{{dubious|poor source usage for putty|date=February 2024}}
|