Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goomba: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:46, 9 April 2005

Revision as of 02:50, 9 April 2005

Line 2:

This is very unencyclopedic. In the real world, encyclopedias don't waste money producing articles about moving pixels. It reeks of fancruft to boot. It's better to start cleaning up Wikipedia now before it gets overrun with gamecruft. I know a lot of people agree with me when I say this article is the perfect starting point. Setting a deletion precedent with this article will lead to a much more professional Wikipedia. [[User:Navid|Navid]] 02:18, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''', mariocruft. [[User:Megan1967|Megan1967]] 02:46, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' [[User:C-list actor|C-list actor]] 02:50, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' Gamecruft. [[User:Z26|Z26]]

*'''Delete''' Wikipedia is not a junkyard. [[User:Y25|Y25]]

*'''Delete''' Pseudoinformation. [[User:X24|X24]]

*'''Delete''' If this stays, then we'll never get rid of all the Pokemon-cruft, and Ashlee Simpson cruft. [[User:W23|W23]]

*'''Delete''' Not notable. [[User:V22|V22]]

*'''Delete''' Unencyclopedic. [[User:U21|U21]]