Content deleted Content added
restoring comment that got lost when page was moved |
|||
Line 36:
::I disagree. Most google hits are for Intentional Programming, and it is not a generic noun in the same way [[functional programming]] is - it's a very unusual, specific set of tools and ideas peculiar to one guy and his followers and companies. --[[User talk:Gwern |Gwern]] [[Special:Contributions/Gwern | (contribs)]] 19:37 [[9 January]] [[2007]] (GMT)
:::Well, we need to settle on whether or not it's a proper noun, and stick to one or the other. When I found the article, the title was "Intentional Programming", but the text used "intentional programming" at the top. - [[User:Furrykef|furrykef]] ([[User_talk:Furrykef|Talk at me]]) 04:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
|