Revision as of 07:23, 7 April 2007 edit Tea2min (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 21,978 edits m Moved last comment to bottom of page. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:25, 7 April 2007 edit undo Tea2min (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 21,978 edits m Signed unsigned comment Next edit →
Line 117: :I don't think it's meant to be this way, but the "WYSIWYG Criticisms" section now comes across as saying that WYSIWYG is the best and anyone who criticizes it is ignorant. The analogies sound like a debate rebuttal rather than an encyclopedia article. I have seen WYSIWYG editors that produce terrible code. It doesn't mean all WYSIWYG is bad, but there is at least some truth to some of the criticisms. There really needs to be more outside evidence to both support and rebut these arguments. 00:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC) == WebEditor+ == ~~Took out paragraph referencing WebEditor+ as it was a shameless ad.~~ Took out paragraph referencing WebEditor+ as it was a shameless ad. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:24.250.216.219\|24.250.216.219]] ([[User talk:24.250.216.219\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/24.250.216.219\|contribs]]) 01:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC2)</small> == Criticisms part NPOV ==

Talk:HTML editor: Difference between revisions