Talk:Primitive recursive function: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 413:
Its still a step more to show that LOOPS are primitive recursive, if
you want to do it properly you would use something like Hoare triples,
etc.. See forFor example: WHILE is defined here:
 
http://www.concrete-semantics.org/
 
They say LOOP is syntactic sugar. Well there is more to it. I think
your primitive recursive article refers already to results about LOOP.
But why not make it a separate article.
 
Strictly speaking Dedekind hardly had any idea of LOOP, there was
not BASIC programming language with a FOR NEXT statements.