Revision as of 20:58, 1 August 2022 edit W.stanovsky (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 4,068 edits m →Climate change: grammer ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 21:58, 28 February 2024 edit undo 12.195.4.130 (talk) →Strengths and weaknesses of approach: Fix grammar
Line 19: A CAC approach in policy is used for several reasons. It has been proposed that by imposing fixed standards with the force of law behind them, CAC can respond more quickly to activities which do not abide by the set standards.<ref name="Baldwin"/> It also has benefits politically as the regulator (often the government) is seen to be acting swiftly and decisively.<ref name="Baldwin"/> It is far from a problem free form of regulation,; the 1980s in particular saw CAC subject to widespread criticism. A good number of the critics tend to favour market-based strategies and are often dubious of the merits of governmental regulatory approaches <ref name="Baldwin"/> Some issues highlighted include:<ref name="Baldwin"/>

Command and control regulation: Difference between revisions