Talk:Primitive recursive function: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:52, 28 February 2024

Revision as of 22:57, 28 February 2024

Line 407:

The wording of the two banners is wrong, given Lazard explanation. The wording

of the banner says there is a "what for" missing, whichby means of an uneducated "I guess" of the layman that put down the banner. It is obviously factual not true for the present text. Thethat Lazarda explanation"what hasfor" differentis story.missing, It talks aboutonly a) addressinglayman peoplethat indoesn't aunderstand commonthe languagefirst b)paragraph settingand prioritiesthe forlast inclusion/exclusion.two Howpagagraphs aboutcan changingclaim thesuch bannersa andnonsense. say that?

The Lazard explanation tells a different story. It talks about a) addressing people in a common language b) setting priorities for inclusion/exclusion. So the banner should have a different phrasing, to not form the laughing stock of Wikipedia.

[[User:Janburse|Jan Burse]] ([[User talk:Janburse|talk]]) 22:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)