Content deleted Content added
re |
re |
||
Line 39:
:::::Now that I think about it, the best solution would be to update the C++ code in the Carbon repo with your code. Then Wikipedia can cite it and also you will be happy. So I would say, open a PR and see what happens. At least that way there will be an official response / nonresponse. [[User:Mathnerd314159|Mathnerd314159]] ([[User talk:Mathnerd314159|talk]]) 18:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Attempting the best solution sounds like a good idea to me, [https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/pull/3735 opened a PR] as suggested --[[User:Ybab321|Ybab321]] ([[User talk:Ybab321|talk]]) 21:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
: OK my PR has been merged now. I'm still OK with the C++ code not being there per the "generally they don't do language comparisons" observation, though Carbon's relationship with C++ is a special one. I'm not really sure what makes the most sense, but I'll add the code comparison back in seeing as we went down this route --[[User:Ybab321|Ybab321]] ([[User talk:Ybab321|talk]]) 23:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
| |||