Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) from Module talk:WikiProject banner) (bot |
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) from Module talk:WikiProject banner) (bot |
||
Line 630:
==Discussion at [[:Template talk:WikiProject banner shell#Duplicate banner templates category|Template talk:WikiProject banner shell § Duplicate banner templates category]]==
[[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|25px|link=|alt=]] You are invited to join the discussion at [[:Template talk:WikiProject banner shell#Duplicate banner templates category|Template talk:WikiProject banner shell § Duplicate banner templates category]]. ‍—‍[[User:A smart kitten|a smart kitten]]<sub>[<nowiki/>[[User talk:A smart kitten|meow]]]</sub> 01:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)<!-- [[Template:Please see]] -->
== WP US not hooking into PageAssessments ==
[[Template:WikiProject United States]] appears to use this banner template, but it doesn't seem to be hooking into PageAssessments for its subprojects. I started a [[Template talk:WikiProject United States#Compatibility with CleanupWorklistBot|discussion at the appropriate spot]] three months ago, but nobody is answering it. This is causing incomplete data in the CleanupWorklistBot-generated lists, specifically [https://bambots.brucemyers.com/cwb/alpha/Louisville.html importance and class aren't showing up]. Can this be fixed somehow, or am I going to have to consider withdrawing projects I maintain from WP US just to get a banner that performs as it should? [[User:StefenTower|<span style="color: green;">'''Stefen <span style="white-space: nowrap;">Tower<sub>s among the rest!</sub></span>'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:StefenTower|Gab]] • [[Special:Contributions/StefenTower|Gruntwerk]]</sup> 18:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
:I believe it is working correctly. I chose a random example [[Digital Equipment Corporation]] and you can see the subproject Massachusetts at the bottom of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=pageassessments&titles=Digital%20Equipment%20Corporation&pasubprojects=true this]. If you still think there is an error, can you provide an example that does not work? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 20:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
::I linked to the example. They're not showing up in the CleanupWorklistBot results, which draws from PageAssessments. [[User:StefenTower|<span style="color: green;">'''Stefen <span style="white-space: nowrap;">Tower<sub>s among the rest!</sub></span>'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:StefenTower|Gab]] • [[Special:Contributions/StefenTower|Gruntwerk]]</sup> 20:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
:::A random example from that page is [[1792 Bourbon]] and the output is [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&prop=pageassessments&titles=1792%20Bourbon&pasubprojects=true here]. I suspect the problem is with that tool, not with this module. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 20:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
::::Hrrrm, thanks. I had no idea how to check this area as it's completely outside my knowledge set. Well, back to the bot developer. :) [[User:StefenTower|<span style="color: green;">'''Stefen <span style="white-space: nowrap;">Tower<sub>s among the rest!</sub></span>'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:StefenTower|Gab]] • [[Special:Contributions/StefenTower|Gruntwerk]]</sup> 20:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::I would ask the question whether [[User:CleanupWorklistBot]] is designed to work with subprojects, and if not could that functionality be added — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 20:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
::::::OK, this is now cleared up and bot's code has been changed to cover this. Thank you for your assistance! [[User:StefenTower|<span style="color: green;">'''Stefen <span style="white-space: nowrap;">Tower<sub>s among the rest!</sub></span>'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:StefenTower|Gab]] • [[Special:Contributions/StefenTower|Gruntwerk]]</sup> 20:38, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
== Class colours ==
We are currently using two sets of colours for the quality classes. The main set comes from [[Module:Class]] and a separate set of paler colours which were developed in response to concerns about contrast and accessibility, and are used for the assessment "bubbles", which you see in the nested version.
{| class="wikitable"
!Class
!Standard
!Pale
|-
!FA
|style="background:#9cbdff"|
|style="background:#BED3FF"|
|-
!A
|style="background:#66ffff"|
|style="background:#C0FFFF"|
|-
!GA
|style="background:#66ff66"|
|style="background:#C0FFC0"|
|-
!B
|style="background:#b2ff66"|
|style="background:#DFFFBF"|
|-
!C
|style="background:#ffff66"|
|style="background:#FFFFBE"|
|-
!Start
|style="background:#ffaa66"|
|style="background:#FFDBBF"|
|-
!Stub
|style="background:#ffa4a4"|
|style="background:#FFC0C0"|
|-
!List
|style="background:#c7b1ff"|
|style="background:#D2C0FF"|
|-
!NA
|style="background:#f5f5f5"|
|style="background:#F5F5F5"|
|-
!Unassessed
|style="background:#dcdcdc"|
|style="background:#dcdcdc"|
|}
I was going to suggest that we settle on using the pale set for both? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 19:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
:Examples below show current and proposed.
{{WPBS|category=no|
{{WikiProject Cycling/sandbox|class=start|importance=low|demo_page=Talk:Downingtown Country Club}}
{{WikiProject Cycling|class=start|importance=low|demo_page=Talk:Downingtown Country Club}}
}}
:— Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 13:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
:Colours have now been updated. Should be do the same for the importance colours? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 17:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
::I'd support that. The accessibility reasons that drove paler colours for the bubbles, also apply to other places those colours are used - [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 14:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
:::I was also wondering whether we could just put "Start" and "Low" in the bubble, rather than "Start-class" and "Low-importance". The full wording is available in the expanded version of the banner anyway. — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 15:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
::::No opinion, I'll let others chime in on that [[User:DFlhb|DFlhb]] ([[User talk:DFlhb|talk]]) 17:26, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
===Importance colours ===
{| class="wikitable"
!Importance
!Standard
!Pale
|-
!Top
|style="background:#ff97ff"|
|style="background:#FFBFFF"|
|-
!High
|style="background:#ffacff"|
|style="background:#FFCCFF"|
|-
!Mid
|style="background:#ffc1ff"|
|style="background:#FFD9FF"|
|-
!Low
|style="background:#ffd6ff"|
|style="background:#FFE7FF"|
|-
!Bottom
|style="background:#ffebff"|
|style="background:#FFEBFF"|
|-
!NA
|style="background:#f5f5f5"|
|style="background:#F5F5F5"|
|-
!Unknown
|style="background:#dcdcdc"|
|style="background:#dcdcdc"|
|}
I notice that Bottom-importance is indistinguishable from Low-importance in the pale colours. Can a paler version of Bottom be used? — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 11:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
:These paler importance colours are now in use — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 07:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
|