Content deleted Content added
Better word →diagonal = contradiction |
Victor Kosko (talk | contribs) →diagonal = contradiction: Reply |
||
Line 1,318:
:::: However, this loophole never happens in Cantor's argument about real numbers. Given any proposed matching from the natural numbers to the real numbers, once you get the number from the diagonal and change each digit, even the trillionth number on the list must differ from this one since they both have trillionth decimal places, and they are different. There is no "running out of digits to compare" that happens with real numbers. [[User:C7XWiki|C7XWiki]] ([[User talk:C7XWiki|talk]]) 06:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
:::::I’m the only decent anti set theory person you have
:::::the exponential argument is valid, if only aplied to the proof exponential cardinal infinity does not equal the same infinity (aleph 0)
:::::one infinity is exponential of the other to cause the set of reals be ‘all sequences of 1s and 0s’ qualified the same infinite size as the diagonal, yet one infinity must be at least the same size as the other to be able to complete the diagonal.
:::::if you say both are simultaneously so that disproves the final conjecture.
:::::your assuming something absolutely true that is philosophical debatable instead [[User:Victor Kosko|Victor Kosko]] ([[User talk:Victor Kosko|talk]]) 01:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
[[Category:Wikipedia mathematical arguments]]
| |||