Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1213678490 by Thatwhichislearnt (talk) rv dubious edit — what are you trying to achieve exactly? |
→Formal definition: Another go, addressing/dispelling the supposed concern. Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 37:
The above definition of a function is essentially that of the founders of [[calculus]], [[Leibniz]], [[Isaac Newton|Newton]] and [[Euler]]. However, it cannot be [[formal proof|formalized]], since there is no mathematical definition of an "assignment". It is only at the end of the 19th century that the first formal definition of a function could be provided, in terms of [[set theory]]. This set-theoretic definition is based on the fact that a function establishes a ''relation'' between the elements of the ___domain and some (possibly all) elements of the codomain. Mathematically, a [[binary relation]] between two sets {{math|''X''}} and {{math|''Y''}} is a [[subset]] of the set of all [[ordered pair]]s <math>(x, y)</math> such that <math>x\in X</math> and <math>y\in Y.</math> The set of all these pairs is called the [[Cartesian product]] of {{math|''X''}} and {{math|''Y''}} and denoted <math>X\times Y.</math> Thus, the above definition may be formalized as follows.
* For every <math>x</math> in <math>X</math> there exists <math>y</math> in <math>Y</math> such that <math>(x,y)\in R.</math>
* <math>(x,y)\in R</math> and <math>(x,z)\in R</math> imply <math>y=z.</math>
Viewing the relation {{mvar|R}} together with the inclusion into <math>X\times Y</math> allows to speak of the function with ___domain {{math|''X''}} and codomain {{math|''Y''}} or say that it is a function from {{math|''X''}} to {{math|''Y''}}. Some authors do this implicitly, some explicitly, and some view functions as only the relation itself.
*<math>R\subset \{(x,y) \mid x\in X, y\in Y\}</math>
*<math>\forall x\in X, \exists y\in Y, \left(x, y\right) \in R \qquad</math>
|