|
The Program called for the establishment of a national authority "over every part of Palestinian territory that is liberated" with the aim of "completing the liberation of all Palestinian territory". The program implied that the liberation of Palestine may be partial (at least, at some stage), and though it emphasized armed struggle, it did not exclude other means. This allowed the PLO to engage in diplomatic channels, and provided validation for future compromises made by the Palestinian leadership.
Because the Program introduced the concept of a [[two-state solution]] in the PLO, it was rejected by the more radical hard-line factions, which vowed to continue to fight to eliminate [[Israel]], and formed the [[Rejectionist Front]], which was strongly backed by [[Iraq]]. ▼
== Background ==
Following the failure of[[Yom theKippur armiesWar|Fourth ofArab–Israeli [[EgyptWar]] and [[Syria]] to defeat Israel in 1973 in the [[Yom Kippur War]], the Palestinian leadership began formulating a strategic alternative. {{Citation needed|date=February 2024}}
==Specifics of the Program==
The PLO'sTen-Point PhasedProgram Plan did not stipulate clear operational measures and onlymostly repeated the principles of the policies which the Palestinian National Council had accepted in the past: . Section 4 of the program has reaffirmed prior resolutions concerned towards the .
The primary points are <ref>{{Cite web |title=PLO Interim Program (Ten-Point Program) - 8 June 1974 (Historical Text) |url=https://www.palquest.org/en/historictext/9637/plo-interim-program-ten-point-program |access-date=2024-03-19 |website=Interactive Encyclopedia of the Palestine Question – palquest |language=en}}</ref> :
* the denial of [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 242]] (adopted after the [[Six-Day War]]) ▼* the denial of the existence of the [[State of Israel]]
* the demand of the return of all [[Palestinian refugees]] to their original homes ▼* the establishment of an Arab-Palestinian state in the entire region of Palestine within the pre-1948 borders.
* The rejection of [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 242]] (adopted after the [[Six-Day War]]) , as it viewed Palestinians as no more than [[Palestinian refugees|refugees]] .
The innovation of PLO's Phased Plan was in the assertion that each step which would lead to the fulfillment of these goals would be a worthy step. It also stated that any territory, from the region of Palestine, which would be transferred to an Arab rule should be transferred to Palestinian control, also if the takeover of other territories would be delayed as a result. Some interpreted these series of decisions, as a realization by the PNC that it can not fulfill all its goals at once, but rather it would be able to do so in gradual small steps, and as a recognition of the council in the possibility of initiating political and diplomatic measures and not just an "[[Palestinian political violence|armed struggle]]" (although PLO's Phased Plan does not consist of a denial of the use of an armed struggle).{{citation needed|date=December 2019}}
* The rejection of the creation of a Palestinian entity on the condition of the implementation of [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 242|Security Council Resolution 242]] .
* The establishment of a democratic Palestinian state over all of former [[Mandatory Palestine]] ([[Israel]] and the [[Palestinian territories]]) .
▲* theThe demand of the return of all [[Palestinian refugees]] to their original homes .
The program called for the establishment of an "Independent fighting national authority " on "every part of Palestinian territory that is liberated" . This entity would strive to establish a "[[Pan-Arabism|union]]" with the "confrontation countries" ( Belligerent Arab states bordering Israel ) , to achieve "liberation of [[Palestine (region)|all Palestinian territory]]" , as a step towards "comprehensive [[Pan-Arabism|Arab unity]]" .
Section 2 of the Plan states:
: The Palestine Liberation Organization will employ all means, and first and foremost armed struggle, to liberate Palestinian territory and to establish the independent combatant national authority for the people over every part of Palestinian territory that is liberated. This will require further changes being effected in the balance of power in favor of our people and their struggle.
== Palestinian reactionreception == ▼Section 4 of the Plan states:
▲Because the Program introduced the concept of a [[two-state solution]] in the PLO, it was rejected by thefactions morewho radicalinterpreted hard-lineit as a potential path towards a permanent peace agreement with Israel factions, whichand vowed to continue to fight tountil the destruction of eliminate [[Israel]], and formed the [[Rejectionist Front]], which was strongly backed by [[Iraq]]. {{Citation needed|date=February 2024}}
: Any step taken towards liberation is a step towards the realization of the Liberation Organization's strategy of establishing the democratic Palestinian State specified in the resolutions of the previous Palestinian National Councils.
The Ten Point Program was rejected by the more radical hard-line factions of the PLO, which were mainly concerned that the Program could potentially turn into a peace agreement with Israel. They formed the [[Rejectionist Front]] and vowed to continue the armed struggle to eliminate [[Israel]]. The factions that joined the Rejectionist Front included the [[Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine]] (PFLP), the second largest faction in the PLO, after Fatah. These factions would act independently of the PLO over the following years. Suspicion between the Arafat-led mainstream and the moreRejectionists hard-line factions, inside and outside the PLO, have continued to dominate the inner workings of the organization ever since, often resulting in paralysis or conflicting courses of action.{{citation needed|date=December 2019}} A temporary closing of ranks came in 1977, as Palestinian factions joined with hard-line Arab governments in the [[Steadfastness and Confrontation Front]] to condemn Egyptian attempts to reach a separate peace with Israel, which eventually resulting in the 1979 [[Camp David Accords]].{{citation needed|date=December 2019}}▼Section 8 of the Plan states:
:Once it is established, the Palestinian national authority will strive to achieve a union of the confrontation countries, with the aim of completing the liberation of all Palestinian territory, and as a step along the road to comprehensive Arab unity.
A temporary closing of ranks came in 1977, as Palestinian factions joined with Arab governments in the [[Steadfastness and Confrontation Front]] to condemn Egyptian attempts to reach a separate peace with Israel, which eventually resulted in the 1979 [[Camp David Accords]].{{citation needed|date=December 2019}}
▲== Palestinian reaction ==
▲The Ten Point Program was rejected by the more radical hard-line factions of the PLO, which were mainly concerned that the Program could potentially turn into a peace agreement with Israel. They formed the [[Rejectionist Front]] and vowed to continue the armed struggle to eliminate [[Israel]]. The factions that joined the Rejectionist Front included the [[Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine]] (PFLP), the second largest faction in the PLO, after Fatah. These factions would act independently of the PLO over the following years. Suspicion between the Arafat-led mainstream and the more hard-line factions, inside and outside the PLO, have continued to dominate the inner workings of the organization ever since, often resulting in paralysis or conflicting courses of action.{{citation needed|date=December 2019}} A temporary closing of ranks came in 1977, as Palestinian factions joined with hard-line Arab governments in the [[Steadfastness and Confrontation Front]] to condemn Egyptian attempts to reach a separate peace with Israel, which eventually resulting in the 1979 [[Camp David Accords]].{{citation needed|date=December 2019}}
In 2000s , PLO representative to Lebanon [[Abbas Zaki]] once stated in a video translated by [[Middle East Media Research Institute|MEMRI]] that "The two-state solution will lead to the collapse of Israel".<ref>{{cite web |author=www.memri.org |date= |title=Palestinian Ambassador to Lebanon Abbas Zaki: Two-State Solution Will Lead to the Collapse of Israel |url=http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3297.htm |accessdate=2016-11-19 |website=Memri.org}}</ref> {{Citation needed|date=February 2024}}
Israel called the Program the ''"PLO's Step/stage Program"'' or ''"PLO's Phased Plan"'' (''Tokhnit HaSHlavim'' or ''Torat HaSHlavim''), which it regarded as a dangerous policy, mainly because it implied that any future compromise agreement between Israel and the Palestinians would not be honored by the PLO. It raised the fear among Israelis that the Palestinians may exploit future Israeli territorial compromises to "improve positions" for attacking Israel. {{Citation needed|date=February 2024}} ▼
As of 2024 , The status of the Phased Plan within the PLO's current polices is unclear. {{Citation needed|date=February 2024}}
Over the years, negotiations took place between Israel and the PLO and other Palestinian leaders, while there was a strong concern among large parts of the Israeli public and the Israeli leadership that the negotiations were not sincere, and that the Palestinians' willingness to compromise was just a smoke-screen for implementing the Ten Point Program. {{Citation needed|date=February 2024}}
When the [[Oslo Accords]] were signed, many Israeli right-wing politicians openly claimed that this was part of the ploy to implement the Ten Point Program.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nfc.co.il/archive/003-D-6200-00.html?tag=23-15-32 |title=News1 | מבט פלשתיני לפתרון הסכסוך |website=Nfc.co.il |date=2012-10-30 |accessdate=2016-11-19}}</ref><!-- Date, Hebrew title, and translated title would be very useful on this reference.--> ▼▲Israel called the Program the ''"PLO's Step/stage Program"'' or ''"PLO's Phased Plan"'' (''Tokhnit HaSHlavim'' or ''Torat HaSHlavim''), which it regarded as a dangerous policy, mainly because it implied that any future compromise agreement between Israel and the PalestiniansPLO would not be honored by. Some Israeli observers believe [[Israeli–Palestinian peace process|negotiations]] with the PLO . It raisedare not sincere the fear, amongand Israelisallege that the Palestinians may exploit futureconceded Israeli[[Palestinian enclaves|parts]] of the [[Palestinian territories|Occupied territorialTerritory]] compromises to "improveimplement positions"the Ten-Point Program , and eventually fortake attackingover Israel. {{Citation needed|date=February 2024}} .
Nowadays thereThere is a debate within Israel on whether the Phased Plan still represents the thinking unofficial policy and officialopinion policy of certain factions within the Palestinian leadership and ofPublic the, Palestinian people and whether the Palestinian public and leadership stillthey aim to ultimatelyeventually take control over the entire regionentirety of former [[ PalestineMandatory (region)|Palestine]] or whetheronly Palestinianto territorialthe claims[[Palestinian applyterritories|occupied onlyareas]] to the [[West Bank]] (including [[East Jerusalem]]) and the [[Gaza Strip]].<ref>{{cite news | urllast1=ארי |first1= http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,Lיוסי בן |date=2014- 3344810,00.html09-17 |title=ynet מה עושים כשהמודיעין סותר את עצמו? - חדשות | newspaperurl= Ynet |date=2014http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L- 09-173344810,00.html |accessdate=2016-11-19 |last1=ארי | first1newspaper= יוסי בן Ynet}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=תוכנית השלבים |trans-title=Phased Plan |url=http://reut-institute.org/he/Publication.aspx?PublicationId=113 |title=תוכנית השלבים |language=he |trans-title=Phased Plan |access-date=2016-11-20 |language=he}}</ref> ▼The [[Foreign Affairs Minister of Israel|Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs]] has noted that the Palestinian leadership asserted that the Oslo Accord is part of the PLO's 1974 Phased Plan for Israel's destruction.<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite web |url=http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Archive/Peace+Process/1996/INCITEMENT%20TO%20VIOLENCE%20AGAINST%20ISRAEL%20BY%20LEADERSHI |title=INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE AGAINST ISRAEL BY LEADERSHIP OF PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY - 27-Nov-96 |website=www.mfa.gov.il |access-date=15 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070622142512/http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Archive/Peace+Process/1996/INCITEMENT%20TO%20VIOLENCE%20AGAINST%20ISRAEL%20BY%20LEADERSHI |archive-date=22 June 2007 |url-status=dead}}</ref> ▼
▲When the [[Oslo Accords]] were first signed, many Israeli right-wing politicians openly claimed that this was part of the ploy to implement the Ten Point Program.<ref>{{cite web |date=2012-10-30 |title=News1 | מבט פלשתיני לפתרון הסכסוך |url=http://www.nfc.co.il/archive/003-D-6200-00.html?tag=23-15-32 | titleaccessdate= News1 | מבט פלשתיני לפתרון הסכסוך2016-11-19 |website=Nfc.co.il |date=2012-10-30 |accessdate=2016-11-19}}</ref> <!-- Date, Hebrew title, and translated title would be very useful on this reference.-->
The status of PLO's Phased Plan nowadays is unclear. The Plan was never officially canceled, but in general, the Palestinian leadership has stopped referring to it since the late 1980s. Recently, however, several statements made by PLO officials on the subject indicate that the Phased Plan has not been abandoned – most notably the statement of the PLO ambassador to Lebanon which stated in an interview that the "two-state solution will lead to the collapse of Israel".<ref>{{cite web |author=www.memri.org |url=http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/3297.htm |title=Palestinian Ambassador to Lebanon Abbas Zaki: Two-State Solution Will Lead to the Collapse of Israel |website=Memri.org |date= |accessdate=2016-11-19}}</ref>
▲TheIn 2007 , the [[Foreign Affairs Minister of Israel|Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs]] has noted thataccused the Palestinian leadership assertedof exploiting that the [[Oslo AccordAccords]] isto part ofimplement the PLO'sTen 1974Point PhasedProgram Plan as an initial step towards [[Calls for the destruction of Israel|Israel's destruction ]].<ref name= "autogenerated1 ">{{cite web |url=http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Archive/Peace+Process/1996/INCITEMENT%20TO%20VIOLENCE%20AGAINST%20ISRAEL%20BY%20LEADERSHI |title=INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE AGAINST ISRAEL BY LEADERSHIP OF PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY - 27-Nov-96 | websiteurl= http://www.mfa.gov.il /MFA/Archive/Peace+Process/1996/INCITEMENT%20TO%20VIOLENCE%20AGAINST%20ISRAEL%20BY%20LEADERSHI | accessurl- datestatus= 15 January 2022dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070622142512/http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Archive/Peace+Process/1996/INCITEMENT%20TO%20VIOLENCE%20AGAINST%20ISRAEL%20BY%20LEADERSHI |archive-date=22 June 2007 | urlaccess- statusdate= dead15 January 2022 |website=www.mfa.gov.il}}</ref>
▲Nowadays there is a debate within Israel on whether the Phased Plan still represents the thinking and official policy of certain factions within the Palestinian leadership and of the Palestinian people and whether the Palestinian public and leadership still aim to ultimately take control over the entire region of [[Palestine (region)|Palestine]] or whether Palestinian territorial claims apply only to the [[West Bank]] (including [[East Jerusalem]]) and the [[Gaza Strip]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3344810,00.html |title=ynet מה עושים כשהמודיעין סותר את עצמו? - חדשות |newspaper=Ynet |date=2014-09-17 |accessdate=2016-11-19|last1=ארי |first1=יוסי בן }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://reut-institute.org/he/Publication.aspx?PublicationId=113 |title=תוכנית השלבים |language=he |trans-title=Phased Plan |access-date=2016-11-20}}</ref>
==See also==
* [[Israeli–Palestinian conflictpeace process|Israeli-Palestinian peace process]]
* [[PLOOslo Accords]]
▲* the denial of [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 242]] (adopted after the [[Six-Day War]])
* [[Palestinian right of return]]
* [[Salami tactics]]
| 