Content deleted Content added
Boynamedsue (talk | contribs) →Step 3, discover which sets are in complementary distribution: remove whom tag, not WP:WEASEL, this refers to a discovery which became universally accepted. The agent may be informative, but it is not essential and no opinion is being hidden |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5) (Лисан аль-Гаиб - 18257 |
||
Line 38:
===Early works===
{{See also|Uralic languages#Uralic studies}}
In the 9th or 10th century AD, [[Yehuda Ibn Quraysh]] compared the phonology and morphology of Hebrew, Aramaic and Arabic but attributed the resemblance to the Biblical story of Babel, with Abraham, Isaac and Joseph retaining Adam's language, with other languages at various removes becoming more altered from the original Hebrew.<ref>"The reason for this similarity and the cause of this intermixture was their close neighboring in the land and their genealogical closeness, since Terah the father of Abraham was Syrian, and Laban was Syrian. Ishmael and Kedar were Arabized from the Time of Division, the time of the confounding [of tongues] at Babel, and Abraham and Isaac and Jacob (peace be upon them) retained the Holy Tongue from the original Adam." [http://lameen.googlepages.com/ibn-quraysh.html Introduction of Risalat Yehuda Ibn Quraysh – مقدمة رسالة يهوذا بن قريش] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090729093347/http://lameen.googlepages.com/ibn-quraysh.html |date=29 July 2009 }}</ref>
[[File:Sajnovics - Demonstratio.jpg|thumb|Title page of Sajnovic's 1770 work.|alt=|258x258px]]
| |||