Revision as of 06:53, 5 April 2024 edit Buidhe paid (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 930 edits →Implementation: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:54, 5 April 2024 edit undo Buidhe paid (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 930 edits →Edit request 4 Next edit →
Line 242: ::{{u\|STEMinfo}} the sections this edit is replacing are currently in the article. They have been completely rewritten in my version with very little of the original text/sourcing remaining. ::#You can see that the "Standard library" is currently unsourced. As I explain above I was able to confirm that a section on this topic was UNDUE. ::#The current "design and implementation" section is partly cited but many of the sources are not ideal—such as lecture notes, which may not be considered RS, and a book from 1982, which is certainly outdated. ~~Other~~Large parts are entirely unsourced or original research<ref>for example, see the bullet: {{tq\|An explicit definition of the syntax, static semantics, and execution semantics of the language. While syntax is commonly specified using a formal grammar, semantic definitions may be written in natural language (e.g., as in the C language), or a formal semantics (e.g., as in Standard ML and Scheme specifications).}} The only sources are the specification for Standard ML and Scheme, that obviously doesn't support the rest of the content</ref> ::#My version of the draft removes content that is poorly or not sourced and replaces it with a new version that is supported by reliable sources and does a better job balancing the coverage of different topics in overviews of the subject. ::Does this answer your question?

Talk:Programming language: Difference between revisions