Talk:Leap second: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Keeping an eye on Earth's Omega: All of the remaining leap seconds will be positive.
Line 135:
 
Ladies, Gentlemen, please permit me to point out that there are clearly three metonic cycles (1964–1984, 1984–2004, 2004–2024 ) in [https://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/products/combined/C04plottest.php?date=2&dimx=1200&dimy=900&graphe=5&year1=1962&month1=1&day1=1&year2=2031&month2=12&day2=31&langue=1&SUBMIT=Submit+request this] and [https://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/products/combined/C04plottest.php?date=2&dimx=1200&dimy=900&graphe=55&year1=1962&month1=1&day1=1&year2=2031&month2=12&day2=31&langue=1&SUBMIT=Submit+request this] plots. The fact that there is continual acceleration is clearly evident. With regards and friendship, Georges Theodosiou, the Straw Man, [[User:Georges T.|Georges T.]] ([[User talk:Georges T.|talk]]) 13:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
 
:The continual acceleration is not evident to me. It seems more like randomness. Perhaps you can explain so I can understand. [[User:John Sauter|John Sauter]] ([[User talk:John Sauter|talk]]) 11:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 
===A useful page of links to the future of leap seconds===