Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Multiple sequence alignment/1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Multiple sequence alignment: I'd like to take a stab at this |
→Multiple sequence alignment: comment |
||
Line 7:
:A request to make the lead image smaller from GA1 doesn't seem to have happened. It is still too big for [[MOS:IMGSIZE]]. As well as the unsourced sections and inappropriate extlinks there is a lot of material that appears to be primary-sourced and promotionally worded about individual research projects or implementations, rather than being based on published works by disinterested parties surveying and reviewing the methods that are available, I think maybe problematic with respect to [[WP:GACR#3b]] (going into excessive detail). —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 02:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
:I'd like to make time to go over this article this weekend, and I'd appreciate the reassessment remaining open for just a few extra days. Thanks ― [[User:Synpath|'''Syn''']][[User talk:Synpath|path]] 04:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
::I've gone through and removed external links in the body of the article and adjusted the lead, but that only amounts to cosmetic changes to the article. I can see now that handling the citations and removing the conversational tone of the article is more editing than I'm willing to spend time on. Thanks for keeping the discussion open. ― [[User:Synpath|'''Syn''']][[User talk:Synpath|path]] 06:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
| |||