MediaWiki talk:DYK-nomination-wizard.js: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 48:
 
:@[[User:Jonesey95|Jonesey95]] In looking at the example [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/History_of_Palestinian_journalism&oldid=1217287342 before] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/History_of_Palestinian_journalism&oldid=1217289847 after]: frankly, the bulleted list layout is really a garbage fire in both cases -- but in the former the presentation suggests that the "Kominko, Maja" source was "reviewed", in the change it suggests that the topic "History of Palestinian journalism" has been "reviewed" - at best (the blist is a mess so it is still ambiguous). I'm not sure what this workflow is supposed to be showing to tell if this made things better or worse? Not blaming you for this, but would much prefer the entire layout got fixed if possible? — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 13:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
:: Neither was reviewed. The thing that "reviewed" pertains to in that case is [[Template:Did you know nominations/Dahiru Musdapher]]. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub>]] 14:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)