Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Multiple sequence alignment/1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:01, 8 April 2024

Latest revision as of 16:58, 11 April 2024

Line 1:

===[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Multiple sequence alignment/1|Multiple sequence alignment]]===

{{atopr}}

: {{al|Multiple sequence alignment|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Multiple_sequence_alignment/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • [[Talk:Multiple sequence alignment/GA1|Most recent review]]

: <span>{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Multiple sequence alignment/1|[[Category:GAR/77]]}} '''Result''': Delisted.</span> [[User:Hog Farm|Hog Farm]] _{''[[User talk:Hog Farm|Talk]]''} 16:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)<br/>

: {{GAR/current}}<br/>

In addition to substantial uncited text, the lead of the article is a bit too difficult and the body contains large numbers of external links. [[User:Femke|—Femke 🐦]] ([[User talk:Femke|talk]]) 17:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Line 8:

:I'd like to make time to go over this article this weekend, and I'd appreciate the reassessment remaining open for just a few extra days. Thanks &#8213; [[User:Synpath|'''Syn''']][[User talk:Synpath|path]] 04:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

::I've gone through and removed external links in the body of the article and adjusted the lead, but that only amounts to cosmetic changes to the article. I can see now that handling the citations and removing the conversational tone of the article is more editing than I'm willing to spend time on. Thanks for keeping the discussion open. &#8213; [[User:Synpath|'''Syn''']][[User talk:Synpath|path]] 06:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

{{abot}}