Content deleted Content added
→I'm missing a pro/cons section: new section |
TucanHolmes (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 145:
I'm not a regular Wikipedia editor, so I don't know what the right terminology would be: Reception? Review? Benefits and Drawbacks? [[User:Snorkop|Snorkop]] ([[User talk:Snorkop|talk]]) 08:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
:We can't do a pro/con-section on our own, that would be [[WP:OR|original research]]. We need reliable sources, at least several of them, to create something like that. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tech review blog, and unless there are specific and notable criticisms of Kotlin, no such section will be necessary.
:We do have comparison pages, e.g. [[Comparison of C and Pascal]], [[Comparison of C Sharp and Java|Comparison of C# and Java]] or [[Compatibility of C and C++]], but these are plagued with issues, mainly those that I have mentioned above, and we need enough material (a large enough body of reliable sources) to create them. They need to be useful to the reader, and they need to exist for a reason, i.e. the topic, the underlying comparison, needs to be notable enough to warrant its own article. [[User:TucanHolmes|<span style="background-color: #eff6ff; color: #0645ad; padding: 2px 3px;">TucanHolmes</span>]] ([[User talk:TucanHolmes|talk]]) 14:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
| |||