Revision as of 10:14, 17 April 2024 edit Dedhert.Jr (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 11,353 edits ce ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:29, 18 April 2024 edit undo Dedhert.Jr (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 11,353 edits →GA Review: no need second opinion, just quickfailed Tag: Reply Next edit →
Line 31: Others are the comments that may suggest that you could add the parameter "inline" for every math formula in the inline paragraph, avoiding the excessive vertical spaces. Also, in the case of references, does Stanley 2011 have a publisher, as the source is said to be [[WP:RS\|reliable]] if there are exist of authors, years published, and the publisher? I think this quickfailed the article, but I probably need a second opinion, stating this strongly and adding some more comments, or another user who gives opposition to these comments. [[User:Dedhert.Jr\|Dedhert.Jr]] ([[User talk:Dedhert.Jr\|talk]]) 10:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC) :On second thought, I think this could be quickfailed due to the failure of meeting [[WP:GACR\|one of GA criterias]]. [[User:Dedhert.Jr\|Dedhert.Jr]] ([[User talk:Dedhert.Jr\|talk]]) 16:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Constant-recursive sequence/GA1: Difference between revisions