Content deleted Content added
Silverback (talk | contribs) added solar forcing and counter balanced the dismissive "by no means a new idea" |
OK, but if we want a second example, it would be best to use the second largest forcing, not the third |
||
Line 1:
'''Climate commitment studies''' attempt to assess the amount of future warming that is "committed" by the present levels of climate forcings, even assuming no further increase. This is by no means a new idea [http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2001/2000GL011786.shtml]; the concept is discussed in the [[IPCC]] [[TAR]] [http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/008.htm] and in the [[SAR]] in 1995, although even at the time of the TAR there were no studies of the levels of unrealized climate commitment from past increases in the greenhouse gasses or
The basic idea is that if a perturbation - such as an increase in [[greenhouse gas]]es or
Recent models (both complex AOGCMs and more simple models) forecast that even in the unlikely event of greenhouse gases stabalising at present levels, the earth would warm by an additional 0.5 °C by 2100, a similar rise in temperature to that seen during the previous century. As ocean waters expand in response to this warming, global sea levels would mount by about 10 centimetres in the next hundred years. But the model does not account for ice cap and glacier melting; a better estimate might be double or triple this value [http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050314/full/050314-13.html].
|