Reassignment method: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Altered template type. Add: eprint, class. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | #UCB_toolbar
Veezay (talk | contribs)
m typo
Line 159:
== Extensions ==
 
=== Consensus complex reassignmetreassignment ===
Gardner and Magnasco (2006) argues that the [[auditory nerve]]s may use a form of the reassignment method to process sounds. These nerves are known for preserving timing (phase) information better than they do for magnitudes. The authors come up with a variation of reassignment with complex values (i.e. both phase and magnitude) and show that it produces sparse outputs like auditory nerves do. By running this reassignment with windows of different bandwidths (see discussion in the section above), a "consensus" that captures multiple kinds of signals is found, again like the auditory system. They argue that the algorithm is simple enough for neurons to implement.<ref name=Gar06>{{cite journal |last1=Gardner |first1=Timothy J. |last2=Magnasco |first2=Marcelo O. |title=Sparse time-frequency representations |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |date=18 April 2006 |volume=103 |issue=16 |pages=6094–6099 |doi=10.1073/pnas.0601707103|doi-access=free |pmid=16601097 |pmc=1431718 |bibcode=2006PNAS..103.6094G }}</ref>