Talk:Hierarchical clustering: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 87:
 
I also noticed that whilst you have submitted a conflict of interest edit request, you have also edited the page. If you do have a conflict of interest with this article please see [[WP:COI]] which recommends against editing the page directly. Thanks, <span style="border:solid #166DF8 2px;padding:4px;border-radius:0.3rem;">[[User:Encoded|Encoded]]</span>  <span style="border:solid #FFDE24 2px;padding:4px;border-radius:0.3rem">[[User talk:Encoded|Talk 💬]]</span> 07:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 
:Thanks for your reply and your quick look at this issue. Because this is quick look, it has overlooked the same issue that I raised. I am new to the Wiki edit and try to do some editing on April 26 and 27, 2024. Yet, from around 2014 up to April 26, 2024, there had been 17 linkage criteria in the linkage summary table. This table has been made with the efforts of some very good-hearted volunteer, maybe Wiki editor. There have been an item between the Minimum Variance (MNVAR)[9] and the Hausdorff linkage[10], called Mini-max linkage, between them. One can easily check the existence of this item, and see that this item has not been the product of the incident on April 26-27, 2024. On April 26-27, 2024, just an additional new link has been added to this item, and there are a total of two links for this item. As a new person of Wiki Edit, I do not know that to add a new link may be labeled as cite-spamming. Instead of just deleting the additional link, the whole record of Mini-max linkage, which should have been there when the summary table was set up, has been deleted. This is what I described as over-deleting.
:It seems that just a quick look at the issue has not realized my point about this issue. [[Special:Contributions/223.16.242.216|223.16.242.216]] ([[User talk:223.16.242.216|talk]]) 09:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)